🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.